But mind you, this is at high resolution and a render/simulation distance of the full 32 chunks. I was shocked to immediately get 500-700 frames per second, just like YouTubers got! But I found this was a peak case - it can drop as low as 60FPS. Then I used MultiMC with (and this is important) an ARM version of Java that is NOT the one that comes bundled with MacOS. It's a lot like trying to play Minecraft on my 2015 MBP. Running straight x86 Java Minecraft through Rosetta is honestly barely playable - sometimes you can get 20 fps, but you get frequent slowdowns. I have a 16' Macbook Pro with the 10 CPUs and 32 GPU cores. Azul Customer Support Engineering.Your mileage obviously may vary. But actually, the author of JMRI should compile the code to add support for m1 mac. JMRI/lib/macosx/libjinput-osx.jnilib (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library x86_64 Using x86-64 java on m1 mac with rosetta translator could be a workaround. JMRI/lib/macosx/libjinput-osx.jnilib (for architecture i386): Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386.

JMRI/lib/macosx/libjinput-osx.jnilib (for architecture ppc): Mach-O dynamically linked shared library ppc. JMRI/lib/macosx/libjinput-osx.jnilib: Mach-O universal binary with 3 architectures.

It does not support arm64 architecture, so it cannot be used with arm64 java. It contains native libraries apparently used for accessing hardware, like. It seems purejavacomm is the serial port manager for this project, the library should be rebuild for ARM64 arch. Hello Jim, Our engineering team points to contact the JRMI team to fix the problem, as it the root cause is not in the Zulu JVM, but in the JRMI libraries used that are not compiled for M1.

Jvm for mac m1